2013 – We all didn’t die!


grumpy-cat-new-yearsWell it’s New Years Eve here in Australia and just over an hour left of 2012.

2013 is just around the corner, the Myans were wrong, we all didn’t die!

So what’s next?

2013 for me will be more work, more AR Drone flying in particular some long range flights when I install my RC mod when it arrives in a few days.

There’s a lot slated for release by Apple next year, I’m due for a new Macbook so will be interesting to see what comes next in that range.

All in all it looks like another busy year in our ever increasing busy lives.

Stay safe everyone!

Darren

Is Burn Out Why IT People Change Jobs So Much?


A colleague posted this on twitter this morning and I thought I would repost it with original authors credits, what caught my eye was it’s very much what IT jobs can be like and certainly been my experience working in the IT industry in the last 10 years or so. The trick is to recognise when your in the rejection stage and get out before you end up ruining your career or reputation.

3 November 2012 By

The positions I have held as a network engineer have had a predictable life cycle. I’ve been through it 3 times now. Thought I’d share, and see if others have had similar experiences, or if it’s just me. I do know a lot of IT people frequently change jobs, and my suspicion is that burn out is a big part of the problem.

Phase 0 – The Search

The first part of any employer relationship begins with the search. You look online, talk to friends, talk to vendor reps, and feel out where there might be opportunities. I do a lot of this “feeling out” when I’m looking for a new place to hang my keyboard. I want to hear from someone that knows a bit about the company I’ve heard has an opening.

If all sounds reasonably promising, I’ll try to land an interview. Assuming I can get one, I’ll ask at least as many questions as I am asked. I find that usually, the people interviewing me do more talking than I do, which suits me just fine as long as they got out of me what they needed to know. If that goes well, then there will be a second interview. And maybe a third. Or more.

And if things are still going well, it’s compensation package negotiation time! Before I’ve gotten to this point, I’ll have already groked that the salary can work for me. From there, it’s just getting it to a point where I can make the jump.

Phase 1 – Honeymoon

When starting a new job, I think of the first few months as a honeymoon. You’re getting to know your new employer, your coworkers, your way around the building, discovering the network, getting a handle on what the company actually does, determining what’s important vs. not-so-important, office politics, who can scrounge you a proper monitor, just how demanding the after-hours on-call is, and what sort of projects you’re going to be involved with.

This phase tends to be low-stress. You barely know enough about what’s going on to be stressed about anything. There’s the emergency that lands in your lap once in a while, but you can shake those off. You have time in the morning for leisurely coffee and a doughnut (or two), you can read the daily networking industry news, prepare effectively for meetings, draw network diagrams without interruption, and handle whatever provisioning, escalation, or other requests come at you with aplomb.

Phase 2 – Reality

After several months or perhaps a year, you’ve settled into a busy groove. You’ve groked the projects, and have a role in them. You’re probably leading some of them. You’ve met all of the people that are likely to need to know your name. Your co-workers know who you are and what you can do. You have due dates for projects. You’ve had some meetings with vendors. You get CC’ed on a number of e-mail threads that don’t represent action items for you, but people just think you should be “in the loop”. You contribute to the local wiki. You stay late some days to keep up. Alternately, you come to the office early once in a while to stay on top of your workload.

In this phase, you are busy. You’re still eager to please, and are getting good feedback from people you work with. You feel competent and challenged, but pretty spent by the end of the day. Fridays are more of a delight that perhaps they ought to be. On paydays, you might make a special effort to go out for lunch with friends, just to get out of the office.

Phase 3 – Insanity

After 3 or 4 years, you have become a raving lunatic. Your project load is obscene, because you’re never given the opportunity to finish anything before something else comes along that’s the new number one priority. You’ve discovered dozens of things that you know should be done to improve the network. Some of them are subtle. Some of them keep you up at night. You make lists of them so you don’t forget to address them when you have a chance. When you have a chance, you’re usually so stressed out from everything else that you’ve been working on, that you don’t bother much. You are summoned to more and more meetings. Being double-booked is not uncommon. You actively seek to be removed from meeting rosters, but people keep inviting you “just in case”.

You multitask almost constantly, managing real-time situations while also doing work on projects. Your whiteboard is a muddy marker haze of erased diagrams, disconnected lists, ticket numbers, part numbers and phone numbers. From time to time, you erase the whiteboard bits that you can’t remember why you wrote them down to begin with so that there’s room to scrawl something new. Your inbox is completely overrun with incoming messages, and you give up hope that you can keep up with it. IMs and text messages become the preferred communications medium for anything important, because anything sent via e-mail is likely to be ignored or simply missed.

In this phase, you’re tired, moody, forgetful of promises made, fearful of what your forgetting, constantly distracted by immediate issues, planning and designing in ten minute rush sessions, managing far more projects than you can reasonably keep track of, and just generally out of sorts. Every day is a fresh source of anxiety, pressure, and confused priorities. You live in fear of being asked about project progress you haven’t had the time to make. You rationalize your inability to keep up despite your best efforts with the fact that there’s just too much to do. You tell yourself you’ll be able to get through it, once a few things get crossed off the list. But somehow, sleep is still fleeting.

Phase 4 – Collapse

After a few months of an insane work life, you completely give up. You realize there’s no point in trying to do everything you should be doing, so just try to keep up with what management has deemed is most important. You try to relax as best you can, and work within the confines of what you can do. The problem is that you’re not especially good at leaving something partly done.

In this phase, you’re stressed to a point, but because you’ve given up hope that you’ll ever be able to keep up with the job the way it should be done, you’re less worried about it. You’re slightly less wound up, but the taste of bitter dissatisfaction bathes your mouth constantly.

Phase 5 – Rejection

You’re at the point where now, you don’t like your work. You don’t hate it. You just don’t like it. There’s too much to do, there’s not enough people to get it done, cloning technology is both unavailable and of questionable legality, and the demands never stop coming. Everyone knows who you are (even people you’d never suspect), and so you’re pulled into an endless number of conversations and meetings, whether you really need to be there or not. Your lists of things to do are as long as ever and as relevant, but you don’t actually anticipate getting any of them done. You flit from today’s most important thing to tomorrow’s, monitor deadlines, and blast through whatever you absolutely must to meet those deadlines. At the end of each day, you just leave, because you’ve rejected the idea that this network, finally, will be the one that’s set up like you know it should be. You start thinking about other employers, and on particularly depressing days, you begin to search for other opportunities. You wonder if you could do something other than IT stuff, and still make the sort of income you need to make. But that’s really a fantasy, because you love networking too darn much.

In this phase, you’re stressed to meet your deadlines, but mostly, you’re apathetic. You feel badly about that, because you’re the sort of person that cares. That’s why you’re good at network engineering to begin with. A network needs someone to care for it. Interfaces need tending. Configurations need standardizing. Routing protocols shouldn’t be allowed to configure themselves. And sysadmins don’t know a tag from a trunk. But when you know the caring is killing you, you have to stop caring, and seek another network where your care will be rewarded.

Next time, it will be different.

I’m back… it’s been awhile!


Hi everyone,

I’m back after a long hiatus, yes it’s been awhile!

It indeed has been a crazy time, work and personal commitments have kept me busy and the motivation to keep updates going was just not there.

But I’ll try to keep things updated a bit more.

So what’s been going on? LOTS!

We saw lots of Apple things happening, indeed the IT sector has been buzzing like never before with the OS wars, the tablet wars, the smartphone wars, patent wars and lots of new shiney gadgets and fuzzy feel good marketing to make us part with our hard earned dollars.

I’ve yet to update to a new iPad 3, although I’ve seen how good they are and Apple doesn’t disappoint!

It will be interesting to see what the next iteration of the iPhone will bring. Rumours suggest a larger screen, faster, more storage and more internal gadgets to make us want one.

Let’s see what comes next!

Apple working to adopt 802.11ac 5G Gigabit WiFi this year


By Daniel Eran Dilger Published: 02:34 PM EST on Apple Inside

Apple is expected to rapidly deploy support for the new 802.11ac specification this year, adding so called “Gigabit WiFi” to new AirPort base stations, Time Capsule, Apple TV,notebooks and potentially its mobile devices.

The new 802.11ac standard achieves much faster wireless networking speeds than the existing 802.11n specification (in use on the latest Mac, AirPort and iOS devices) by using 2 to 4 times the frequency bandwidth (from 80 to 160MHz), more efficient data transfers through sophisticated modulation, and more antennas (up to 8; existing standards support up to 4, while Apple’s Macs currently use up to 3).

While not yet finalized as an official standard by the 802.11 Working Group, progress on the new 802.11.ac standard is occurring faster than previous efforts in wireless networking have.

Multiple suppliers have already issued chipsets supporting 802.11ac for consumer grade applications. Key Apple component maker Broadcom announced chips supporting the standard earlier this month at CES.

In addition to reaching networking speeds above 1 Gigabit (about three times as fast as 802.11n networks can manage), 802.11ac promises better networking range, improved reliability, and more power efficient chips, thanks to parallel advances in reducing chip size and enhancing power management.

Apple popularizes WiFi with AirPort

While Apple wasn’t the first company to sell wireless devices, it was first to bring the technology into the mainstream beginning in 1999, when Steve Jobs dramatically demonstrated Apple’s initial AirPort technology onstage at the July Macworld Expo as “one more thing” after showing off the company’s new consumer iBook notebook.

Jobs pretended to hold his new iBook notebook up to provide a clear view for the camera operator, but he then continued to use the web as he walked across the stage to the delight of the audience that suddenly realized the new notebook had a wireless connection.

 

While Intel and others were promoting wired home networking schemes using landline phone wiring, Apple quickly brought WiFi into common use with support for AirPort across its Mac desktop and laptop line and its new AirPort branded base stations, making secure wireless technology both affordable and easy to use.

The WiFi technology Jobs demonstrated was second generation 802.11b; an earlier 802.11 version had previously been developed but only offered a tenth of the speed, making it less than practical for mainstream users. At the same time, 802.11b wasn’t formally ratified until September of 1999, making Apple’s inclusion on the iBook a forward-looking innovation. It also made the iBook the first mainstream computer sold with integrated WiFi.

In January 2003, Apple launched AirPort Extreme, its brand name for the improved 802.11g standard. While backwardly compatible with 802.11b devices, the new AirPort Extreme base station and compliant computers could now achieve wireless networking speeds up to five times faster. The 802.11g standard wasn’t formally ratified for another six months after Apple released its first implementation of it.

Apple sneaks out 802.11n

In September 2006, Apple offered a sneak peek at Apple TV. It seemed immediately obvious that Apple would empower this using the new 802.11n standard, but it was widely doubted at the time that Apple could release support for the much faster new version of WiFi before the standard was ratified.

However, in January 2007 Apple announced that Apple TV did indeed use 802.11n, alongside new AirPort base stations also supporting a draft version of the still unfinished specification. The company also acknowledged that it had secretly included support for the fast new “draft n” specification in all of its previously released Core 2 Duo Macs.

Due to accounting concerns, Apple planned to charge a nominal $4.99 fee for distributing the drivers needed to activate this unadvertised hardware feature on recent Macs. After a hailstorm of caustic criticism, Apple dropped the fee to $1.99, and subsequently included the drivers into the next version of Mac OS X for free.

The 802.11n standard wasn’t formally ratified until October of 2009, nearly three years after Apple began rolling it out. By May 2008, Apple was recognized by NDP Group as having a 10.6 percent share of WiFi base station sales, and AirPort Extreme was named the top selling 802.11n router in the US.

AirPort advances since 802.11n

The new 802.11ac isn’t expected to be fully approved as a finished standard until late next year, but Apple is poised to adopt it well before then. Since the initial rollout of 802.11n Macs, AirPort base stations and Apple TV in early 2007, Apple has incrementally advanced support for new facets of the 802.11n specification and has also developed new practical applications tied to wireless connectivity.

In 2008 Apple launched support for 802.11n base stations and clients operating in the 5GHz band at the launch of Time Capsule. In this frequency band, WiFi devices can double their bandwidth allocation to a wide 40 MHz to allow faster networking speeds, nearly doubling the theoretical maximum. For existing Macs, this boosted top speeds from 130 to 300 Mbps.

In 2009 Apple enhanced AirPort Extreme and Time Capsule products with support for simultaneous 2.4 and 5GHz band operation and guest access.

The following year, Apple launched iPad with support for both 802.11n and 5GHz networks. iPhone 4 followed with support for 802.11n, although it could not connect to 5GHz networks.

Last year, Apple’s Thunderbolt Macs silently incorporated support for three send and receive antennas, enabling them to achieve a top data rate of 450 Mbps on 5GHz networks with wide channels.

Lion 802.11n 450 Mbps

 

Apple also enhanced its AirPort Extreme and Time Capsule last summer, increasing their range and radio power output and adding support for new Mac’s triple antennas while extending simultaneous operation to automatically use both 2.4 and 5GHz bands.

Software applications for WiFi

In addition to hardware advances, Apple has introduced a variety of technologies that focus on WiFi networking, including Bonjour-discoverable disk and printer sharing from AirPort Extreme base stations, AirTunes wireless audio distribution introduced alongside AirPort Express, and Mac OS X Leopard’s Time Machine backups designed to work with Time Capsule.

 

Last year, Apple introduced AirPlay as a replacement for AirTunes, enabling iTunes and iOS devices to wirelessly stream both audio and video to Apple TV. AirPlay Mirroring on iPad 2 and iPhone 4S enable those devices to export their primary video display to an HDTV via Apple TV.

In Mac OS X Lion, Apple introduced support for AirDrop, enabling nearby users to share files without configuring a WiFi network.

The tremendous speed gains possible with 802.11ac will continue to make Apple’s wireless technologies from AirPlay to Time Machine faster and more efficient, virtually erasing any advantage in using wired network cabling in most cases.

HTML5: A Look Behind the Technology Changing the Web


By DON CLARK

A year and a half after Steve Jobs endorsed it in an unusual essay, a set of programming techniques called HTML5 is rapidly winning over the Web. Don Clark has details on Digits.

A year and a half after Steve Jobs endorsed it in an unusual essay, a set of programming techniques called HTML5 is rapidly winning over the Web.

The technology allows Internet browsers to display jazzed-up images and effects that react to users’ actions, delivering game-like interactivity without installing additional software. Developers can use HTML5 to get their creations on a variety of smartphones, tablets and PCs without tailoring apps for specific hardware or the online stores that have become gatekeepers to mobile commerce.

HTML5

That promise—and the lure of Apple Inc. devices in particular—is sweeping aside alternative technologies. In the latest development, Adobe Systems Inc. said Wednesday it will pull back on pushing the rival Flash format opposed by Mr. Jobs for mobile devices.

“HTML5 is a major step forward,” declares venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, who helped invent the first successful browser, Netscape, in the 1990s.

Another Silicon Valley investor, Roger McNamee, predicts the technology will let artists, media companies and advertisers differentiate their Web offerings in ways that weren’t practical before. “HTML5 is going to put power back in the hands of creative people,” he says.

Many companies are placing bets. Amazon.com Inc. used HTML5 for a Web-based app called Kindle Cloud Reader that sidesteps Apple rules for selling content on its iPhone and iPads.

“Angry Birds” creator Rovio Entertainment Ltd. developed an HMTL5 version that lobs avian projectiles at enemy pigs with no need for an app. Pandora Media Inc. used the technology to overhaul its popular Internet radio website, which launches more quickly and helps users more easily track others’ listening patterns. Publications including Playboy and Sports Illustrated used HTML5 to let online readers boost the size of photos and rapidly flip through them.

The trend has been fueled by Apple, Google Inc. and Microsoft Corp.—rivals that more often disagree about technology choices—by building HTML5 support into their latest Web browsers. So have the Mozilla Foundation, maker of Firefox, and Opera Software ASA.1111pandora

Some 34% of the 100 most popular websites used HTML5 in the quarter ended in September, according to binvisions.com, a blog that tracks Web technologies. Resume searches by hiring managers looking for HTML5 expertise more than doubled between the first quarter and the third quarter, according the tech job site Dice.com.

The excitement has spread despite the fact that HTML5 is missing some key features. Many users, moreover, won’t notice striking differences from websites that use Flash.

But Flash, a dominant Web technology before the advent of smartphones, relies on downloaded add-ins to browsers called plug-ins. Mr. Jobs withheld support for the approach in iPhones and iPads, and railed against it his April 2010 essay “Thoughts on Flash.”

1111pandora

PandoraPandora Media shifted to HTML5 from Adobe’s Flash so its Internet-radio website loads more quickly.

Besides citing technical concerns with Flash, Mr. Jobs argued Apple couldn’t allow itself to become dependent on Adobe for such critical technology. As a result, on Apple’s mobile devices, websites that rely on Flash display black boxes where videos or graphics should appear.

Adobe rejected Mr. Jobs’s arguments, but hedged its bets by developing programming tools that support HTML5 as well as Flash. On Wednesday, it said it would no longer develop new versions of Flash for mobile browsers.

Google has continued to support Flash in the browser delivered with its Android software. But developers want to create Web apps that work both with Android and iOS, Apple’s mobile operating system, says Danny Winokur, Adobe’s general manager for interactive development.

“If you want to be delivering a Web experience around multiple devices, you have to be doing it in HTML5,” he says.

HTML5 takes its name from hypertext markup language, the standard commands used to create Web pages. But the term is a catchall for multiple techniques to handle elements like typography, graphics and video, creating an app-like experience.

“When you show people HTML5 applications, they say that doesn’t feel at all like a website,” says Dean Hachamovitch, the corporate vice president in charge of Microsoft’s Internet Explorer browser.

The technology is equally important for companies to play snazzy-looking ads in mobile apps, says James Lamberti, a vice president at InMobi Mobile Insights, which places ads on mobile devices. He says that major advertisers using its services swelled to 250 in September from 62 in January. “If they are doing rich-media ads, they are doing HTML5.”

Then there are Flash-based games that haven’t been available on the iPhone and iPad, such as popular titles from Zynga Inc., that work with Facebook Inc’s social network. The San Francisco company recently announced three HTML5-based games that work on the Apple devices, exploiting a new Facebook mobile app platform that supports the technology.

Peter Thiel, founder of Clarium Capital and the Thiel Foundation, explains to WSJ’s Alan Murray the three key things he looks for when determining whether to invest in a company.

Interest from game developers was apparent last week at New Game 2011, a technical conference in San Francisco. Though HTML5 games don’t match the graphics and fast action of PC and console games, attendees noted, free social games on the Web are attracting users.

“The real thing you are competing for now is not dollars but the users’ time,” says Richard Hilleman, chief creative director for game maker Electronic Arts Inc. “So I need to be everywhere they are, and on all the devices that they have.”

A shift to HTML5 games that work on many devices, in theory at least, could reduce one of Apple’s advantages—the thousands of apps that work only with its hardware specifically.

Cadir Lee, Zynga’s chief technology officer, predicts companies will keep tailoring apps for hit devices like Apple’s for some time. Yet he thinks HTML5 could eventually evolve to be an even broader technology movement, like that created with websites that could display almost any content. “There is another wave of that revolution that is coming,” Mr. Lee says.

Write to Don Clark at don.clark@wsj.com

Microsoft confirms takeover of Skype


10 May 2011 on BBC News UK

Skype website

Microsoft has confirmed that it has agreed to buy internet phone service Skype.

The deal will see Microsoft pay $8.5bn (£5.2bn) for Skype, making it Microsoft’s largest acquisition.

Luxembourg-based Skype has 663 million global users. In August last year it announced plans for a share flotation, but this was subsequently put on hold.

Internet auction house eBay bought Skype for $2.6bn in 2006, before selling 70% of it in 2009 for $2bn.

This majority stake was bought by a group of investors led by private equity firms Silver Lake and Andreessen Horowit.

Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer said: “Skype is a phenomenal service that is loved by millions of people around the world.

“Together we will create the future of real-time communications so people can easily stay connected to family, friends, clients and colleagues anywhere in the world.”

Skype will now become a new division within Microsoft, and Skype chief executive Tony Bates will continue to lead the business, reporting directly to Mr Ballmer.

Price concerns

Analysts say Microsoft’s aim in buying Skype is to improve its video conferencing services.

Although the price tag of $8.5bn will not stretch the US giant, some experts have questioned whether it is paying too much for a company that has struggled to turn a profit.

Michael Clendenin, managing director of consulting firm RedTech Advisors, said: “If you consider [Skype] was just valued at about $2.5bn 18 months ago when a chunk was sold off, then $8.5bn seems generous.

“[It] means Microsoft has a high wall to climb to prove to investors that Skype is a necessary linchpin for the company’s online and mobile strategy.”

This view was echoed by Ben Woods, head of research group CCS Insight.

“The big unanswered question is how do Skype assets work for Microsoft… how do you justify the price?” he said.

Skype was founded in 2003.

Calls to other Skype users are free, while the company charges for those made to both traditional landline phones and mobiles.

Why Telstra is wrong on VoIP (by Simon Hackett)


Written by Renai LeMay on Wednesday, May 4, posted on Delimiter

In this opinion piece, Internode managing director responds to comments by Telstra executives earlier on this week about Voice over Internet Protocol-based telephony.

opinion Reading this article, there is just so much wrong with the reported comments from Telstra here about VoIP. Its got technical inaccuracies and factual errors of significant sorts all through it.

I’ll work through a representative sample of what I mean …

To ensure the service provides an acceptable level of quality, Telstra has pledged to spend part of a $600 million package on upgrading equipment in its telephone exchanges with Broadsoft hardware to support quality of service (QoS) techniques to prioritise voice traffic.

Broadsoft make the VoIP soft-switch that handles call switching decisions for VoIP traffic. They don’t make network hardware. So the wrong vendor has been named here in this context. Its like saying that you’re getting a tyre manufacturer to improve the way a plane’s wings work. This speaks to the general lack of accuracy in the statements made.

Next, and more tellingly, when Telstra speak of upgrades needed to make VoIP work properly, its important to understand that this means that Telstra have (clearly) under-invested to date in their ADSL network and its management of QoS in both the backhaul and DSLAM components of their network — but that existing VoIP providers with their own DSLAM networks (such as Internode and iINet) designed in the appropriate QoS right up front.

So the key point to understand is that when Telstra say that VoIP isn’t yet reliable, they are making a statement about the quality of the Telstra network only, not about VoIP in general.

They are saying their network isn’t up to scratch (and apparently requires $600 million to fix it), not that VoIP in general isn’t up to scratch. And clearly the many operators of VoIP services providing them to hundreds of thousands of Australians don’t have the problems with it (nor do their customers) that Telstra feels they should be having.

It’s also surprising to see that $600 million figure in the context of this being a network Telstra intend to shut down in the National Broadband Network era. What are they really spending that money on? Is it really network upgrades, or is that just the size of their marketing/rebate slush fund to try to draw customers back from competitors with subsidised deals? Is this sort of margin erosion the best course of action for Telstra to use to best benefit its shareholders?

Hence it seems that the correct re-interpretation of “we don’t think the quality and reliability is there. We could bring it to the market tomorrow, but we don’t want to” is really “our network isn’t up to scratch as yet, unlike our competitors”.

Next comment to respond to:

Telstra’s small business chief Deena Shiff said Telstra’s ‘voice over broadband’ solution was qualitatively different from iiNet’s consumer-grade VoIP, as Telstra was investing to build quality of service into its exchanges – whereas iiNet’s solution relied only on QoS embedded in its routers on users’ premises.

This is the same mis-statement. iiNet’s network (and Internode’s network) were built with designed-in QoS and with appropriate investments in backhaul capacity so that the quality of VoIP services on those networks is just great. Routinely higher quality than, say, a mobile phone network. In other words, the investments Telstra says it’s making to bring in ‘Quality of Service’ are already done in their competitors’ networks. They’re not doing something others haven’t. They’re merely catching up from a current stance of being far behind in this important area.

“They don’t give you an end to end quality experience,” she said. Shiff emphasised that Telstra’s solution was “not VoIP”, but instead described it as “digital voice”, stressing that the high definition of the audio set the Telstra solution apart.

There are two distinct points to respond to in the quote noted above.

1. Of course the Telstra solution is VoIP. Telstra have named Broadsoft — whose product, Broadworks, is a VoIP soft-switch. This is the very same (high end, high quality) VoIP switching software product that is in use in the national Internode and iiNet VoIP service networks today, and that has been in use in both of those networks since circa 2005. Broadworks don’t make some magic pudding called ‘Digital Voice’ that is not VoIP. They’re one and the same thing.

This sort of sleight of hand is disappointing to see, as its just not an honest representation of a situation where Telstra are catching up to the rest of the market (or rather, are promising that they’ll do so). They’re launching a service using this ‘digital voice’ in a month. Are they really spending $600 million on upgrades in just 30 days, or again, is this figure really just the size of their marketing budget?

2. “High definition audio” is a feature of the current generation “Fritz!Box 7390″ and ‘Fritz!Box 7270″ Home/SME ADSL2+ routers that are sold by Internode today.

HD Audio is a standard capability of VoIP services using sufficiently good VoIP hardware (and the Fritz!Box products are simply at the top of the heap in this regard). The quality delivered by a Fritz!Box using its DECT cordless handsets, when calling another HD Audio endpoint (another Fritz!Box or otherwise) is so good that it’s really quite spooky — far and away better in quality than a traditional PSTN phone call. And of course dramatically lower cost (for instance, unlimited NodePhone VoIP to NodePhone VoIP calls on the Internode service are free of per-call charges entirely).

HD Audio uses a standard VoIP CODEC (G.722). This is not a Telstra innovation in any sense. It is, again, Telstra catching up, late and last, with capabilities that its competitors in this space have been offering to the market already.

Finally, and a key point here — while Telstra are framing VoIP as being somehow inadequate for consumer requirements, they are deeply in negotiation with NBN Co to turn off their copper network and move all their voice endpoints nationally over to the NBN. Guess what — the voice ports on the NBN customer termination boxes are actually … VoIP hardware. On the NBN, your “PSTN” service will be turned into VoIP right in the NBN Co fibre termination box and the call will be carried via standard VoIP/SIP protocols — exactly as all VoIP providers already do today.

There is a deep sense in which the statements made about VoIP by Telstra today are simply trying to deflect its own status as the last adopter of this technology by claiming that it is somehow not going to be good enough until Telstra ‘invents’ it via some mysterious magical property imbued upon it by calling it ‘digital voice’ instead of VoIP.

It’s like IP Multicast — a technology that Internode and others use to deliver highly efficient linear TV channels using our FetchTV service. We can’t sell that to customers of ours that we reach via Telstra Wholesale ADSL2+ services, because Telstra haven’t yet seen fit to ‘invent’ IP Multicast. So in their world, it doesn’t exist.

Sorry, but it does. And so does High Definition, high quality VoIP services. Sure, you have to use appropriate hardware at the customer end point (like a Fritz!Box) and you need your network to be built properly.

But everyone in the industry ‘cept Telstra already does these things today.

Image credit: Internode


Apple Registers iCloud.com for Online MobileMe Replacement?


Posted by Kevin | April 29, 2011 on GottaBeMobile

It was reported that Apple bought the domain iCloud.com from a Swedish company called Xcerion and now we learned from Apple Insider that Apple is using the name internally as it preps the newest versions of iOS and Mac OS X.

When you type the domain icloud.com you get a page redirect to cloudme.com and the browser title bar says, “Your files online”. However, when it finally loads the new site has absolutely no Apple branding. It is just the old Xcerion site announcing its re-branding.

This is likely smart naming by the company from whom Apple bought the domain. They probably have not yet flipped the switch to the new Apple service. The name fits the Apple branding scheme.

The new service will likely replace the MobileMe backup and sync service which offers users email, online calendars, photo and video hosting, and web hosting along with file storage. The new service could also supplement iTunes and grant users online storage for their music, videos, and apps. If Apple really gets radical it could replace iTunes altogether, something that would cause many to rejoice since iTunes feels so outdated and is very clunky when running on Windows.

Like many Apple rumors, there are conflicting reports that the upcoming service will either be free or that it will be free but transition into a paid service. The latter seems unlikely since most services that attempt to make that transition fail. We think it will be a freemium model with part of it being free but advanced functions (that is the stuff you would actually want) will be a paid service. Right now MobileMe is $99/year although deals can be found for less.

All of this is most likely to be housed in the Maiden, NC facility that is nearing completion. We’ve driven by the facility and it is not very noticeable from the road – a guard shack on an unmarked road with high manmade mounds surrounding the whole facility so it cannot be seen from the road. However, a local TV station talked to someone who went inside the facility and that person said it was too big for just hosting iTunes. Something like a video streaming service would need the kind of computing power hosted in this enormous facility.

In June at Apple’s WWDC, we will likely learn more about the new service, if not before.

The mobile world… and mobility in general.


I’m been doing a lot of thinking lately about how the mobile world and mobility in general has been shaping up over the last 12 months and also what we know is in store for us over the next 12.

We’ve seen a plethora of mobile devices hit the markets from all manufacturers from smart phones and music players up to tablets and the next generation of laptops and mobile computing and often I’ve had co-workers ask me about this device and that one and which one is best and which one they should buy.

Unfortunately often I’ve had to say to them take your pick, because no one single device does everything yet and one device may suit one person over another. I’ve seen and heard testimonials of users both praising and poo pooing the latest and greatest and one thing is certain, everyone has different expectations, usage patterns and wow factor resistance.

It’s no secret I’m an avid Apple fan and use a broad range of their products and that’s because the usage experience for me with these devices is second to none for my expectation level and well I think they have a HUGE wow factor but others don’t. Why is that?

I know people who swear by everything Microsoft and hate Apple and their fan base with a passion, why is that also?

I think that often people that get used to one platform or another feel a sense of security in all things that is their domain and anything outside it is often perceived as foreign. I used to be a Windows fan and also swore and cursed when someone mentioned Apple but after giving one of the main alternative platforms a go I opened up my eyes to the possibility of picking and choosing the best of what’s out there and making use of the best tool available no matter who the manufacturer or platform.

So what makes a good mobile platform?

I think it’s a combination of a few things including of course user experience, ease of use, form factor and connection and charging options, compatibility with other systems used along side your mobile platform such as your corporate network or home LAN. Of course it has to do the main things you always need access to such as email, web browsing, file and LAN access and in many mobile workers cases access to the main social network tools such as Facebook and Twitter etc.

A mobile device should give you access to all these things and yet not cost too much, be durable and light and easy to use and finally manufacturers are getting this idea and releasing newer smart phones and tablets that do most of these features well. Now that the tablet market has kicked off after the release of the original Apple iPad, other manufacturers are releasing tablets such as the Samsung Galaxy Tab based on the Android OS, we’re seeing other vendors announcing their own versions as well.

The next 12 months promise to be even better with the maturity of Apple’s iOS and iPhone and iPad line and other manufactuers announcing pending releases we should see many more tools for these devices that promise to do more and more.

Will the maturity of the mobility market see a drive towards these kind of content consumption devices and a move away from traditional mobile computing such as laptops?

Only time will tell!

Lukemia Sufferer sends robot to school…


stepan

A VERY special student is attending a lesson at Moscow’s school number 166: Stepan, a plastic robot, is in the classroom to help a little boy with leukaemia to follow the lesson through his eyes.
  • Robot goes to school on sick boy’s behalf
  • We treat him as if he is here with us – teacher
  • Technology could be used for workers too

In the meantime, the real Stepan, a 12-year-old boy with big blue eyes and brown hair, sits in front of a computer at his home and takes an active part in the lesson with help of his plastic friend.

Stepan Supin has been suffering from leukaemia for two years and his immune system is too fragile to allow him to leave home.

Equipped with a webcam, a microphone and a loudspeaker, the robot broadcasts in real time what happens in the classroom to the computer at the boy’s home.

A screen in front of the robot actually allows the human Stepan to intervene at any time to ask for the teacher’s clarification or to answer a question, teacher Alla Gevak said.

“We also call our robot Stepan. When the lesson begins, he starts working as an ordinary student and participates very actively,” she added.

Since September, the robot has been helping the boy to follow history, geography, English, and French lessons. Other subjects, such as Russian and mathematics, still require a teacher’s visits, Gevak said.

Stepan said he feels like his is actually present in the classroom as he can fully control the robot’s movements.

“I can change the robot’s speed, to go slower or faster. I can move his head to look left or right. I really feel as if I am in the classroom,” Stepan said.

Gevak shares the feeling. “At first it was a bit strange, but we got used to it. During breaks between lessons, Stepan communicates very actively with other students. We treat him as if he is here with us,” she said.

For the boy’s mother, Nina Supina, this “presence” is really what matters.

“Children have fun in the classroom, frolic and communicate. Stepan can take part. He lacks it – a little boy’s normal life,” she said.

Designed in 2008 at a Moscow institute, the robot which costs $3000, can receive orders remotely via the internet from anywhere in the world, the project coordinator Vyacheslav Kravtsov said.

“It can be used in many spheres of life. We intend to use it primarily in the social sphere – in education, healthcare, and for disabled people’s remote work,” he said.

“There are many disabled people in our country and they need help.”

Stepan Supin’s school received the robot for free as part of a pilot project launched by its designers.

But no matter how grateful he is to his robot, Stepan said he hopes though to get away from him one day and go back to school like every other boy of his age.